{"id":13411,"date":"2024-10-22T14:21:49","date_gmt":"2024-10-22T20:21:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/handandmachine.org\/classes\/computational_fabrication\/?p=13411"},"modified":"2024-10-22T14:21:49","modified_gmt":"2024-10-22T20:21:49","slug":"large-assignment-4-luka-bazar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/handandmachine.org\/classes\/computational_fabrication\/2024\/10\/22\/large-assignment-4-luka-bazar\/","title":{"rendered":"Large Assignment 4 – Luka Bazar"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Process & Explaination <\/h3>\n\n\n\n

All three of my forms have the same base shape, each layer is a square with a thickness (in this case three layers wide) that rotates slightly on each increase in layer height to create the bit of wobble that can be seen as the layers stack up. The outermost layer is the one that is changed for each of the three forms to create three different forms with the same base shape. The first two cubes both simply have places where the path moves away from the original square and back to the original square and continues up. The last cube meanwhile follows the original square the entire time but will move up and down in set intervals to create the vertical lines that can be seen in both the Cura screenshot and the final print.

The base forms without the adjustments to the outer layer could be generated in a traditional slicer but the changes I made to just the outer layer are what makes these forms unable to be generated in a traditional slicer. For the first two cubes, both have paths that move the nozzle in mid-air and create a textured surface that cannot be generated by a traditional slicer. The third cube on the other hand utilizes the non-planar z movement to move in a triangle up and down to create vertical lines which also would not be generated in a traditional slicer. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Iterative Design Process<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

One of the forms I attempted to make was this continuous spiral, but unfortunately, it did not print very well for how tall it was going to be and my code did not leave enough room to be able to change how it was formed. It was very restrained to this shape and scaling it in any capacity was difficult so I went with something more simple.

\"\" \"\"

The first cube with the small loops went so well that I pushed the second cube with the larger loops since I anticipated that I could. Since I had a base that printed well already the other two forms built off of the same one and didn’t have any issues printing. I do wish I had more time to experiment with more varied shapes and forms but I didn’t have the time to invest into that how I wanted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cura Screenshots<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"
First Cube (small loops)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Second Cube (large loops)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Third Cube (non-planar z)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Photos of 3D Prints<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Grasshopper Code<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
LukaBazarLA4<\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Process & Explaination All three of my forms have the same base shape, each layer is a square with a thickness (in this case three layers wide) that rotates slightly on each increase in layer height to create the bit of wobble that can be seen as the layers stack up. The outermost layer is the one that is changed […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":46,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13411","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-large-assignment-4-g-code-assignments24"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/handandmachine.org\/classes\/computational_fabrication\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13411","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/handandmachine.org\/classes\/computational_fabrication\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/handandmachine.org\/classes\/computational_fabrication\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/handandmachine.org\/classes\/computational_fabrication\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/46"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/handandmachine.org\/classes\/computational_fabrication\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13411"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/handandmachine.org\/classes\/computational_fabrication\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13411\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13531,"href":"https:\/\/handandmachine.org\/classes\/computational_fabrication\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13411\/revisions\/13531"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/handandmachine.org\/classes\/computational_fabrication\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13411"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/handandmachine.org\/classes\/computational_fabrication\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13411"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/handandmachine.org\/classes\/computational_fabrication\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13411"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}